Philosophical Implications of Ohio Animal Escape Tragedy
The recent tragedy in Ohio with the exotic animals that escaped from the private farm has made news across the nation and even throughout the world. Meanwhile, there has been a tremendous amount of responses based on emotions, political perspectives and instinctive animal cruelty concerns. This is not to mention the potential threat to people in town and what it means on the safety scale. Personal financial implications can be discussed at https://moneymutual.com/ , where do we turn for major social financial dilemmas and what, if any, does this tragedy mean?
At this point, most of the public outcry has been based on an emotional response to the images that have manifested in minds as well as the disturbing photos and eye witness descriptions that have been given. And as is true for many tragedies of this scoop, the immediate reactionary cries are giving away to apathy, forgetfulness and even cynicism. This is where standard beliefs come to play against the immediate emotional crisis reactions. Do people really care about the well being of wild animals and their importance to the overall environment or was the outrage based more on the demented horror story images that were brought about through the event?
Of course it is important to process the trauma that occurred during this tragedy, and that’s essential to any ongoing dialogue on the topic, but what is essential to the outcome of this situation is how we proceed forward. Was this an event that will cause greater interest in animal laws in the state as well as the nation and inspire more people to take interest in the appropriate way of interacting with the environment and wildlife? Or was it simply that surreal horror film response, that is quickly falling away as easily as one walks away from a movie theatre? Are we as a culture so conditioned to the shock and thrill of reality television that as we return to the stress and daily turmoil of our lives we simply forget the enormity of this tragedy and potential changes that need to occur?
It is a standard theory that people will only take action when they feel it is possible to make a change an can see the results of their efforts before they begin. Is it representative of the extent to which our society has become complacent that we don’t hear more dialogue in the media about all of the issues this addresses and how to rationally and humanely move forward with it? When we have a personal crisis that demands our attention we can easily turn to the resources of money mutual and other financial services to help us through it. How do we make positive changes in legislation, cultural beliefs and necessary political thought when they encompass philosophies that we haven’t room in our minds or lives to even process? And alternatively, should we view the enormous outcry and horror response to the tragedy as a sign that we’re still a caring sensitive species? Perhaps we need more time to see how changes might play out before we can decide. But then, who’s going to make these changes?